The quiet film is more and more becoming a lost art form. What do I mean by a quiet film? A film that doesn't pierce the eardrums with cacophonous sound effects, certainly. A film not filled with loud explosions and crashes, definitely. But while both of these rudimentary definitions qualify that's not what I'm talking about here. I'm talking about films that spend as much time looking at their characters as listening to them. The Last Lullaby (2009), directed by Jeffrey Goodman and written by Max Allen Collins and Peter Biegan based on Collins' short story A Matter of Principal, is such a film. It's a film that explores its lead characters primarily by observation, a rarity in these days of overwritten screenplays that lay too much on the table verbally giving the viewer less chance to catch up on their own. Remember all the talk back in 2007 about the opening 20 minutes of There Will be Blood and how amazing it was that there was little to no dialogue? I felt then about that as I do now, which is to say there shouldn't have been so much amazement. It shouldn't shock us when a visual medium decides to tell its story and explore its characters visually. The Last Lullaby tells its story in whispers and eavesdrops, in glances and hidden stares. And it's all the stronger because of it.
The story of The Last Lullaby is one not unfamiliar to most viewers of film noir. A retired hitman is assigned a job to kill a woman and ends up compromising his position by falling for her. As with most noirs the story itself doesn't matter as much as the characters. Whether it's The Maltese Falcon, Out of the Past or Chinatown, the idea of the hired gun or detective falling for the woman is an old one but one that a good director can infuse with originality if he knows on what to focus.
Tom Sizemore plays the retired hitman Price, a man who can't sleep and wanders the town at night, visiting 24 hour convenience stores to pick up milk or a soda or... well, it doesn't matter. He's just looking for something to do and in one of those visits he finds it in the form of a couple of lowlifes he quickly deduces have kidnapped a woman that they're holding for ransom. Why not take them out of the equation and get the ransom money himself? From here the story of Price slowly unfolds as he takes over the kidnapping that eventually leads him to a job where he will be asked to kill a woman named Sarah, a woman who doesn't seem guilty of anything but, like any noir femme fatale, may be hiding so much more.
Sizemore and Sasha Alexander as Sarah work well together and Alexander is quite good as Sarah but this is Price's story and Sizemore plays him to understated perfection. Tom Sizemore has been around as a character actor since the eighties but shows his film-carrying mettle with his lead here. He keeps Price hidden for the most part but shows just enough to keep the audience interested. His Price is shy, reclusive and withdrawn and yet confident, assured and headstrong when put in danger's way. He connects with his target Sarah because she seems, at least on the surface, to be the same way. And while they both tell each other their stories don't expect long expository scenes between the two because for the most part they are simply together; sitting, swimming, driving, walking. In a climax that will profoundly change both of their lives Price says a mere five words, practically whispered, to a silent Sarah before the sound of a car starting takes us away.
All of this could have been a rather dry affair indeed if not for the combined talents of writers Collins and Biegan and director Goodman. The writing is contained, personable and mercifully free of the excesses of the overly clever rejoinder usually employed in such films but director Jeffrey Goodman deserves most of the credit. He keeps the camera's eye observant, never invasive. The film never becomes about what the camera is doing but what the characters are doing. And in employing a very subtle and yes, quiet, musical score (by Ben Lovett) he moves everything into a trance-like state for most of the film. Neither Price nor Sarah can sleep and wander the world at night, a world that is muted in color and sound to the point where we finally notice there's almost no one else in the film. Their world is uninhabited, as if stranded on a desert island in the middle of America, and Goodman exploits this to great effect until we reach a climax in which each character seems to be standing alone on a vast plain, both emotionally and physically. The Last Lullaby occupies the space between thriller and noir and brings both together on its own quiet and confident terms.

28 comments:
I haven't even heard of this one. I shall keep an eye out. And I thought Tom Sizemore was done, but I guess maybe not.
I've always liked Sizemore ever since seeing him in Natural Born Killers in which he was, honestly, about all I liked in that film. Also, he was by far my favorite character in Saving Private Ryan. Despite problems with the law it appears according to his IMDB page that he's got plenty of work still.
You're so right about the lost of art of quietness in movies. That's what stood out most to me too when I saw this two time last April at the Salem Film Festival. It's quite the debut film.
I'm glad you liked this, Greg. I have an interview up with Jeffrey at my site as well as a review of the film. I think it's one of the best surprises of 2009. I really hope more people seek out the film.
Bill: You should definitely seek this out. Sizemore is great in the film...in fact it may be the first time I've ever seen him dial it down, and he does it to great effect.
Great review here, Greg. I'm glad more and more people around the blogosphere are seeking out this movie.
Thanks Kevin. We both noticed most of the same things in the movie and I should have mentioned as did you that the sounds of gunfire in the film are jarring because the film is so quiet. When someone does shoot it's like an intrusion into the silent world of Price.
And since you've seen it, I also liked the fact that the chase and gunfight scene in the dried brush was handled so efficiently and economically, coming off as the real thing (stumbling about, getting shot in the arm out of carelessness, waiting for the other to get distracted, etc). A very well done scene and film.
Exactly! That to me was one of the scenes that stood out the most. Rarely is a gunfight handled so intelligently or realistically (it's over much quicker than most gunfights in films like this). The soundtrack is a key component too. The score is tremendous.
Yeah, there aren't any real BIG moments where there's a ramp up or a jumpcut as Sizemore closes in for the kill. All the kills just kind of happen, except for possibly the last kidnapper which is played up a little bit but that's right at the beginning so I think they're just trying to hook us in. Otherwise Price is exactly what I actually would imagine a hitman to be - average, ordinary and trying mightily to block out the world.
I'm surprised to hear your praise for Max Allen Collins' writing. His home-based stuff is pretty embarrassing, despite his long association with comics and mysteries. Do we know if he actually wrote the dialogue or just the original story, with the other credited writer writing the dialogue?
Greg,
This sounds great, I'll have to keep an eye out for it. (Is it on DVD?)
Quiet films are indeed few and far between, and all the more welcome for that fact. On a related but separate train of thought, I also miss films with extended takes and quietly evolving scenes, as opposed to lots of fast editing. I particularly remember how much I enjoyed seeing "Blow Up" for the first time only a day or so after witnessing the nausea-inducing shaky-cam work and hyperactive editing of "The Bourne Ultimatum." What a contrast! That sequence of David Hemmings just quietly looking at pics, blowing them up, looing at them again - without any supsense-building music on the soundtrack or any kind of imposed effect to ratchet up the dramatic tension - just felt like heaven to me.
Arbo - I have no idea, nor am I familiar with his writing outside of this. The dialogue is sparse and limited to say the least as is the story. It's more a reflective piece so it doesn't rely on big verbal exchanges or overly twisty plot devices so take that how you will.
Pat, I think the DVD is only available on the website linked to on the title. I was sent a screener as I regularly am and always ignore them or watch them and forget about them. It's pretty much standard here at Cinema Styles that I don't review screeners I get but I really liked this one a lot so there you go.
And I personally don't like the Bourne movies despite their praise. They have good moments and decent stories for thrillers but to me they're just so much noise and clamor.
I have never read any Max Allan Collins, at least not to completion, because he wrote the original ROAD TO PERDITION comic, and I flipped through it one day at the store. The dialogue is...hoo! Stuff like, "Daddy, what is murder?", which I just made up, but which is nevertheless representative of what I found there.
I'm with Greg on this one...the dialogue is one of the least important things about the film. What's impressive is the execution by the filmmaker and his crew in hooking the audience on such a simple premise. The film is wonderfully simplistic in the way noir films are meant to be.
Bill, I would like to know what is murder. Please fill me in, by e-mail if necessary.
Kevin, that's a good description. It tells its story simply, with little to no bells and whistles, without being simple.
I wrote two drafts of the screenplay (a novel, THE LAST QUARRY published by Hard Case Crime, is based on them, expanding my short story). Biegen, whom I've never met, wrote another draft. Then I came in and provided extensive notes, which were essentially a polish -- including suggesting we cut back on Sizemore's dialogue, and Jeffrey did that.
I would say the dialogue is a mix of my work and the second writer's.
The film is expanded not only from my short story but from Jeffrey's award-winning short film, "A Matter of Principal," which I wrote solo.
Like my stuff or hate it or view it with utter indifference, but I do request that you not base your opinion on flipping through a book and then (hoo!) inventing a line of dialogue yourself to indicate how bad I am.
The Quarry series (Quarry is called Price in the film) began as a paperback original series in the '70s, followed by a hardcover novel in the '80s and a handful of short stories in the '90s. The aforementioned LAST QUARRY sparked interest in the series, and two new novels have followed from Hard Case Crime -- THE FIRST QUARRY and the current QUARRY IN THE MIDDLE. All three have been well-received. Bookgasm chose THE FIRST QUARRY as the best novel of last year.
I like Jeffrey's film very much.
I like noir.
And aren't you embarrassed saying bad things about Max Allen Collins NOW?
Mr. Collins, you are correct. I shouldn't judge your work after so little experience of it. I apologize.
Max, thanks for stopping by. I think the dialogue was perfectly sparse, just the right amount and to the point. I mentioned it already but I appreciated that lack of witty rejoinders and one-liners that so infect these types of thrillers usually. As I said, I'm not familiar with your work outside of this but from what I've seen here I'd say you do an excellent job.
Was it your decision to change the name from Quarry to Price or the director's and if so why? Also, any plans on working with Goodman to make some of the other stories?
Apology certainly accepted.
I suggest you try reading one of the Quarry novels or possibly one of the prose sequels to PERDITION, ROAD TO PURGATORY and ROAD TO PARADISE. My best-regarded work is the Nathan Heller historical detective series, and you might try ANGEL IN BLACK or FLYING BLIND, about the Black Dahlia and Amelia Earhart respectively.
There was a semi-coherent dig here about my "home-based stuff," which I presume refers to the indie films I've written and directed in my hometown, Muscatine, Iowa. My first feature, MOMMY (1995), a sort of unofficial sequel to the BAD SEED, was a half-million dollar indie that does have its detractors, but received glowing reviews from Entertainment Weekly, Fangoria, Leonard Maltin, the NY Daily News and other major reviewers, and was bought by a major cable network as a primetime movie and was a chainwide selection by Blockbuster. Since then I've written and directed a MOMMY sequel, a "found footage" crime movie (REAL TIME) done for ten grand, a film capture of my stage play ELIOT NESS: AN UNTOUCHABLE LIFE (on a similar budget), and two documentaries, MIKE HAMMER'S MICKEY SPILLANE and CAVEMAN: V.T. HAMLIN & ALLEY OOP. All are available on DVD. I wonder if the "embarrassing" comment is from someone who has actually seen all of that work.
One of my bestselling novels is the movie tie-in of SAVING PRIVATE RYAN -- ironically with Hanks and Sizemore.
I neglected, in my perhaps knee-jerk self-defense mode, to say what a nice, insightful review of THE LAST LULLABY appeared here.
Max, I think our comments overlapped. See my above and also thank you for the kind words on the review.
As it happens, I do have one of your novels -- SPREE -- and I'll give it a fair look soon.
I don't know who came up with the name Price, whether it was Jeffrey or Biegen, but I approve of its resonance. The name change was done at my insistence to make the film a one-off, and not license the entire series of novels. I've had quite a bit of interest in THE FIRST QUARRY (1st book chronologically in the series, though written recently) and this clears the path. You may recall Don Westlake's Parker appeared as Walker in POINT BLANK for the same reason (Parker's name was changed in THE OUTFIT and THE SPLIT as well).
I would work with Jeffrey again, certainly, and ironically he was looking at my screenplay based on SPREE a while back. But he's expressed a desire for his next project to be a non-noir one.
The screenplay of SPREE was first written for director Bill Lustig, who almost got it made a couple of times in the '90s. I wrote a movie called THE EXPERT for him with Jeff Speakman (!) and James Brolin. It was an HBO world premiere in '95 or '96. If you ever see it, Speakman appears to be trying to remember my dialogue and just speakman-ing whatever comes to mind, whereas Brolin is dead on. It feels like two movies -- the one with Speakman, not so good, and the one with Brolin, not so bad.
Thanks for soapbox. Visit my weekly blog at www.maxallancollins.com
By the way, witty rejoinders aren't necessarily a bad thing, if handled right.
The most quoted lined from LULLABY in reviews is mine, where the kidnap victim's father asks Quarry/Price if he has any children, and the hitman says, "Just yours."
This kind of thing can't just be a gag line -- it has to come from character, as when Quarry/Price describes himself as "a people person," or the abusive boy friend says to Quarry, "I don't want to die," and the hitman says, "Nobody does."
But those aren't the dripping with sarcasm smartass type of one-liners I'm talking about - and even those, I agree, can work well as they do in most James Bond movies - but in a movie like this it would detract. Those lines you quote sound perfectly normal coming out of the characters mouths and not like they're trying to sound like an eighties action hero. Which is to say you wrote their lines realistically, not theatrically, and that fits the piece.
Well said. And thanks.
A wonderful review, Greg! You inspired me to purchase a copy of the film on the strength of it. Also, a sincere thanks to Mr. Collins for dropping in and providing insight on his work.
Lenny Moore
Lenny I hope you like it. Thanks for the confidence in the review.
As I said before, this is a terrific review. I really enjoyed "The Last Quarry" and was excited to see a movie of the same story... and am intrigued by Mr. Collins's statement that the screenplay and novel were written concurrently. I'm very much looking forward to "Quarry in the Middle", which I may pick up for myself after Christmas.
It's good to hear that the movie captures a similar appeal. I'm looking forward to a chance to see it.
Post a Comment